State Action Doctrine

Constitutional rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment and most other constitutional provisions bind only governmental actors — the “state action” requirement — and do not directly constrain purely private conduct.

Elements / Test

Threshold: Is the actor a state or local government, federal government, or someone whose conduct is attributable to the government?

Tests for private actor = state action:

  1. Public function: Private entity performs a function traditionally and exclusively reserved to the state (running a company town — Marsh; running a primary election — Terry v. Adams)
  2. Nexus/entanglement: Sufficiently close relationship between state and private actor — state compelled the conduct, or the two are jointly engaged (Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority — symbiotic relationship)
  3. Joint action: Private actor acts in concert with state officials (Lugar v. Edmondson Oil)
  4. State command: State explicitly authorized or directed the private conduct (Shelley v. Kraemer — judicial enforcement of racially restrictive covenants = state action)

Exceptions and Edge Cases

  • No general nexus: Mere state licensing, regulation, or funding of a private entity does not create state action (Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison)
  • NCAA: Found to be private in NCAA v. Tarkanian (1988)
  • Purely private clubs: Not state actors even if regulated
  • 13th Amendment: Unique — applies to private conduct (prohibition on slavery)
  • Statutory civil rights law (42 U.S.C. § 1981, § 1982, Title VII): Reaches private discrimination; state action not required

Policy Rationale

Preserves sphere of private autonomy; protects freedom of association. But can allow private discrimination to escape constitutional scrutiny — addressed through civil rights statutes rather than constitutional doctrine.

Key Cases

CaseRule
Shelley v. Kraemer (1948)Judicial enforcement of racially restrictive covenants = state action
Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority (1961)Symbiotic relationship between state facility and private restaurant = state action
Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. (1974)Heavy state regulation alone does not create state action
Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co. (1982)Joint participation with state officials = state action
Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assoc. (2001)Private athletic association = state action due to pervasive entwinement with public schools

Covered In