Zivotofsky v. Kerry

Citation and Court

576 U.S. 1 (2015) — Supreme Court of the United States

Facts

Menachem Zivotofsky was born in Jerusalem to American parents. Congress enacted a statute allowing U.S. citizens born in Jerusalem to have “Israel” listed as their birthplace on their passports. The executive branch had long maintained a policy of not designating any country as the sovereign over Jerusalem to avoid prejudging the status of the city in Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations. Secretary of State Kerry refused to apply the statute to Zivotofsky’s passport.

Issue

Whether the Constitution grants the President exclusive power to recognize foreign nations and governments, such that Congress may not require the State Department to list “Israel” on passports of Jerusalem-born citizens.

Holding

Yes. The recognition of foreign states and governments is an exclusively executive power under Article II; Congress may not through statute override the executive branch’s recognition policy by requiring that “Israel” appear as the birthplace of Jerusalem-born citizens.

Rule / Doctrine

Exclusive executive power over recognition: the recognition power — deciding which foreign nations and governments the United States will officially acknowledge — is vested exclusively in the President under Article II. Congress may exercise its constitutional powers (over passports, immigration, etc.) but may not use them to contradict or undermine the President’s recognition decisions, which are the United States’ official position in international relations.

Significance

Zivotofsky v. Kerry is the first Supreme Court case to hold that a specific presidential power is exclusively executive and cannot be shared with or overridden by Congress. It resolves a long-standing academic debate about the recognition power and applies Youngstown’s framework (Justice Jackson’s concurrence) to invalidate a congressional act in the area of foreign affairs, placing the case in Youngstown’s “Category 3” — presidential action contrary to congressional command is sustained only when the President has exclusive constitutional authority.

Courses