Successive Conflicts (MR 1.9)

Definition

Model Rule 1.9 imposes duties to former clients. A lawyer who has previously represented a client in a matter may not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person’s interests are materially adverse to the former client’s interests, unless the former client gives informed, written consent.

Elements

MR 1.9(a) — Successive representation prohibited when:

  1. Lawyer previously represented a client in a matter;
  2. New representation involves the same or substantially related matter;
  3. New client’s interests are materially adverse to former client’s interests; AND
  4. Former client has not given informed, written consent.

Substantial relationship test: A matter is substantially related if it involves the same transaction or legal dispute, or if there is a substantial risk that confidential factual information obtained in the prior representation would normally have been obtained in the prior representation and would be relevant in the new matter.

MR 1.9(b) — applies when lawyer has confidential information from a prior firm about a former client, even if lawyer did not personally represent that client.

Key Concepts

  • Confidential information: Core concern is that the lawyer possesses confidential information from the prior representation that could be used to the former client’s disadvantage.
  • Materially adverse: Not every representation against a former client is barred — only those where interests materially conflict in a related matter.
  • Imputation: Under MR 1.10, if one lawyer in a firm has a successive conflict, the conflict is generally imputed to the entire firm (subject to screening exceptions).

Key Cases

Policy / Rationale

  • Former clients must be able to share information with lawyers without fear that the lawyer will later use that information against them.
  • Lawyers owe ongoing loyalty and confidentiality duties that survive the termination of representation.
  • Preserves client trust in the legal system.

Courses